Wednesday, June 27, 2007
5 jobs with the law
The Indianapolis Star is feature an article about "5 jobs with the law" which includes Paralegals.
Monday, June 4, 2007
Tireless Wireless
By: Courtney David Mills
IPA Technology Director and Litigation Paralegal at Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman, P.C.
Whenever I think about wireless technology, I cannot help but think about what is around the corner, even twenty years from now. If you stop and think about it, twenty years ago, computers were in their infancy and the idea of wireless technology was mostly relegated to telephones and remote controls. Although wireless technology has definitely come of age, it is important to note that all wireless technology is not created equal. This article will discuss some different standards or types of wireless technology and also discuss some uses for same. I will start with Bluetooth technology since it has the hippest name.
Bluetooth Technology:
Bluetooth was named after a late 900s king, Harald Bluetooth King of Denmark and Norway. He is known for his unification of previously warring tribes from Denmark and Norway. Bluetooth likewise was intended to unify different technologies, such as computers and mobile phones. The Bluetooth logo merges the Nordic runes analogous to the modern Latin H and B: (haglaz) and (berkanan) forming a bind rune. Bluetooth technology seems confuse a lot of consumers. I think the primary reasons for the confusion are that its name has no descriptive qualities to it other than the fact that some Bluetooth devices have blue lights on them. The other source of the confusion stems from the fact that the Bluetooth technology is very versatile and can be found in laptops, desktops, key boards, mice, headphones, microphones, headsets, game controllers, printers, cell phones, digital cameras, etc. Bluetooth technology is essentially a wireless technology that is marked by low power consumption and short range between the devices. It allows two devices to connect wirelessly and communicate with each other. This process is called “pairing”. If your laptop has a built-in or external Bluetooth connection device, you can connect to your cell phone (which can be across the room in your jacket or purse) and you can access the internet. You can also connect your laptop to you digital camera to transfer digital pictures (wirelessly), while you listen to music on your wireless headphones. Once the pictures are transferred, you can print them wirelessly on your Bluetooth enabled printer that is located in an upstairs office. Some newer cars even have the option of integrated Bluetooth technology which automatically detects your cell phone when you enter the vehicle and allows you to make and receive phone calls (hands free) and even route the audio of your phone through the car speakers.
Wi-Fi:
Wi-Fi is actually a brand name originally trademarked by the Wi-Fi Alliance, a trade organization that tests and certifies wireless technology. Wi-Fi refers to the technology of Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN) which run on the 802.11 frequency. There are two primary types of WLANs. The first is a computer to computer network or “ad-hoc” network. This type of network allows two or more computers to connect to each other (wirelessly), most often to share files or documents. Ad-hoc networks are not commonly used, but would be extremely useful for a trial team who has a single set of electronic documents that need to be shared amongst the group. You could set-up a small WLAN so that different members of the trial team could all access the files (that are stored on just one person’s computer) in a war room setting. Wi-Fi networks that allow you access to the internet are often referred to as “hot spots” or “access points”. Some are free (i.e. Panera Bread, Shapiro’s Deli, Qdoba, and Au Bon Pain), and some are not (i.e. Starbucks, and Border’s Books). Most hot spots have a relatively short range of 20 – 100 feet (depending on thickness of walls and barriers), but other more powerful transmitters can project several hundred feet. Some businesses and law firms have some sort WLAN in place, but most are hesitant to adopt this technology due to the inherent security concerns present with any sort of wireless technology. In order to connect to the internet at a hot spot, your device (either laptop computer or smartphone) must have either an internal or external wireless card. Most newer laptops have built-in wireless cards and Bluetooth cards. If your laptop does not have a wireless card, you can purchase a card for $20-$60. It is also important to note that there are different levels of wireless technology (802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, and 802.11n). The primary difference between each of the above technologies is range and data capacity. 802.11g is considered the current standard and 802.11n is considered the latest and greatest. The primary area of confusion that I hear from attorneys is that they seem to believe that just because they have a laptop and wireless card, they believe they can access the internet. This is not the case. Unless you have wireless card from your cell phone company (or have the ability to use your cell phone as a modem), you have to be within range of a hotspot or be in a city that has city-wide wireless (referred to Municipal Fi, or Mu-Fi). Mu-Fi is a world-wide movement towards having municipalities offer wide-range wireless networks that cover entire towns and cities. Beech Grove, Indiana is the latest Indiana city to go wireless. Once Beech Grove’s plan is up and running, you can take your laptop anywhere in the city and have instant internet access. You can be in the park, or at your child’s baseball practice. When I told this to one of the attorneys that I work with, he jokingly commented that I should find a court reporter in Beech Grove and start scheduling his depositions there. That way he could at least check his email during a particularly boring deposition. At least, I think he was kidding.
In summary, wireless connectivity holds the key to the future. If you listen to the people like Bill Gates or Paul Allen who are designing the technology of the future, you will quickly discover that they envision a world where location is irrelevant and everything is connected (without the wires). There is no real doubt that in the future, nearly every city will be wireless. Besides the obvious factor of initial investment in infrastructure, the major roadblock to implementing such plans has been lobbying pressure from the telcos that currently provide broad-band internet access. However, cities have realized that Mu-Fi is a great perk to draw-in companies and residents. It also offers a lot of benefits to public safety officials and the ability to better integrate emergency services. The question of Mu-Fi coming to a city near you is no longer if, but when.
Blog of the Month:
The Estrin Report: This blog is perhaps the number one paralegal blog in the country. It is updated several times every day (even on the weekend) and always has interesting stories and links connected to the paralegal profession. It is one of the very few blogs that I check every morning and evening. I also like the self-identifying description, “Created for professional paralegals – not of a certain level, specialty or firm – but of a particular attitude.
http://estrinlegaled.typepad.com/my_weblog/
Website of the Month:
Muni Wireless – The Voice of Public Broadband: This is a great resource for information on Mu-Fi projects in Indiana and across the country.
http://www.muniwireless.com/
IPA Technology Director and Litigation Paralegal at Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman, P.C.
Whenever I think about wireless technology, I cannot help but think about what is around the corner, even twenty years from now. If you stop and think about it, twenty years ago, computers were in their infancy and the idea of wireless technology was mostly relegated to telephones and remote controls. Although wireless technology has definitely come of age, it is important to note that all wireless technology is not created equal. This article will discuss some different standards or types of wireless technology and also discuss some uses for same. I will start with Bluetooth technology since it has the hippest name.
Bluetooth Technology:
Bluetooth was named after a late 900s king, Harald Bluetooth King of Denmark and Norway. He is known for his unification of previously warring tribes from Denmark and Norway. Bluetooth likewise was intended to unify different technologies, such as computers and mobile phones. The Bluetooth logo merges the Nordic runes analogous to the modern Latin H and B: (haglaz) and (berkanan) forming a bind rune. Bluetooth technology seems confuse a lot of consumers. I think the primary reasons for the confusion are that its name has no descriptive qualities to it other than the fact that some Bluetooth devices have blue lights on them. The other source of the confusion stems from the fact that the Bluetooth technology is very versatile and can be found in laptops, desktops, key boards, mice, headphones, microphones, headsets, game controllers, printers, cell phones, digital cameras, etc. Bluetooth technology is essentially a wireless technology that is marked by low power consumption and short range between the devices. It allows two devices to connect wirelessly and communicate with each other. This process is called “pairing”. If your laptop has a built-in or external Bluetooth connection device, you can connect to your cell phone (which can be across the room in your jacket or purse) and you can access the internet. You can also connect your laptop to you digital camera to transfer digital pictures (wirelessly), while you listen to music on your wireless headphones. Once the pictures are transferred, you can print them wirelessly on your Bluetooth enabled printer that is located in an upstairs office. Some newer cars even have the option of integrated Bluetooth technology which automatically detects your cell phone when you enter the vehicle and allows you to make and receive phone calls (hands free) and even route the audio of your phone through the car speakers.
Wi-Fi:
Wi-Fi is actually a brand name originally trademarked by the Wi-Fi Alliance, a trade organization that tests and certifies wireless technology. Wi-Fi refers to the technology of Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN) which run on the 802.11 frequency. There are two primary types of WLANs. The first is a computer to computer network or “ad-hoc” network. This type of network allows two or more computers to connect to each other (wirelessly), most often to share files or documents. Ad-hoc networks are not commonly used, but would be extremely useful for a trial team who has a single set of electronic documents that need to be shared amongst the group. You could set-up a small WLAN so that different members of the trial team could all access the files (that are stored on just one person’s computer) in a war room setting. Wi-Fi networks that allow you access to the internet are often referred to as “hot spots” or “access points”. Some are free (i.e. Panera Bread, Shapiro’s Deli, Qdoba, and Au Bon Pain), and some are not (i.e. Starbucks, and Border’s Books). Most hot spots have a relatively short range of 20 – 100 feet (depending on thickness of walls and barriers), but other more powerful transmitters can project several hundred feet. Some businesses and law firms have some sort WLAN in place, but most are hesitant to adopt this technology due to the inherent security concerns present with any sort of wireless technology. In order to connect to the internet at a hot spot, your device (either laptop computer or smartphone) must have either an internal or external wireless card. Most newer laptops have built-in wireless cards and Bluetooth cards. If your laptop does not have a wireless card, you can purchase a card for $20-$60. It is also important to note that there are different levels of wireless technology (802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, and 802.11n). The primary difference between each of the above technologies is range and data capacity. 802.11g is considered the current standard and 802.11n is considered the latest and greatest. The primary area of confusion that I hear from attorneys is that they seem to believe that just because they have a laptop and wireless card, they believe they can access the internet. This is not the case. Unless you have wireless card from your cell phone company (or have the ability to use your cell phone as a modem), you have to be within range of a hotspot or be in a city that has city-wide wireless (referred to Municipal Fi, or Mu-Fi). Mu-Fi is a world-wide movement towards having municipalities offer wide-range wireless networks that cover entire towns and cities. Beech Grove, Indiana is the latest Indiana city to go wireless. Once Beech Grove’s plan is up and running, you can take your laptop anywhere in the city and have instant internet access. You can be in the park, or at your child’s baseball practice. When I told this to one of the attorneys that I work with, he jokingly commented that I should find a court reporter in Beech Grove and start scheduling his depositions there. That way he could at least check his email during a particularly boring deposition. At least, I think he was kidding.
In summary, wireless connectivity holds the key to the future. If you listen to the people like Bill Gates or Paul Allen who are designing the technology of the future, you will quickly discover that they envision a world where location is irrelevant and everything is connected (without the wires). There is no real doubt that in the future, nearly every city will be wireless. Besides the obvious factor of initial investment in infrastructure, the major roadblock to implementing such plans has been lobbying pressure from the telcos that currently provide broad-band internet access. However, cities have realized that Mu-Fi is a great perk to draw-in companies and residents. It also offers a lot of benefits to public safety officials and the ability to better integrate emergency services. The question of Mu-Fi coming to a city near you is no longer if, but when.
Blog of the Month:
The Estrin Report: This blog is perhaps the number one paralegal blog in the country. It is updated several times every day (even on the weekend) and always has interesting stories and links connected to the paralegal profession. It is one of the very few blogs that I check every morning and evening. I also like the self-identifying description, “Created for professional paralegals – not of a certain level, specialty or firm – but of a particular attitude.
http://estrinlegaled.typepad.com/my_weblog/
Website of the Month:
Muni Wireless – The Voice of Public Broadband: This is a great resource for information on Mu-Fi projects in Indiana and across the country.
http://www.muniwireless.com/
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Want To Be More Professionally Respected In Your Workplace? Consider Becoming A Credentialed Paralegal Through A National Exam
One of the problems the paralegal profession has always faced is the seemingly unending struggle to be accepted as a legal professional. This concern affects each paralegal differently in their career. Some may not be affected at all. Others continue to be forced to “prove” their worth through experience, education, involvement in local or national professional organizations, through speaking engagements, teaching classes, or perhaps through constant and frustrating negotiations within the workplace. I certainly experienced this early in my career.
At a recent IPA Board Retreat, one of the Board members insightfully commented that one of the best ways we, as paralegals, can hope to be more professionally respected in the workplace is to become a credentialed paralegal through a national exam. Another Board member, who is currently making plans to begin studying for PACE, also told me recently that she has noticed increased respect from her employer simply by virtue of showing an interest in sitting for the examination. She also saw a noticeable difference in her employer’s professional respect for her through her involvement on the IPA Board. Two other PACE Registered Paralegals recently pondered whether employers even understand what an “RP” or “CP” means to the legal profession. There seems to be little question as to the meaning, for example, when someone writes “RN” after his or her name. All of these points are very well taken.
Earlier this year, Stacey Hunt, CLA, CAS, and Ann Price, RP wrote an article in Legal Assistant Today discussing the two most widely taken examinations to become a credentialed paralegal ~ NALA’s Certified Legal Assistant exam (“the CLA exam”), created in 1976, and NFPA’s Paralegal Advanced Competency Exam (“PACE”), created in 1994. NALA also recently began offering Advanced Specialty Certification exams which is also a part of NFPA’s two-tiered, long range plan.
Interestingly, the very first sentence in the LAT article meets this issue head on ~ “Professional certification lends credibility to any profession, and the paralegal profession is no exception.” [Emphasis added].
Paralegals who pass the CLA exam earn the CLA/CP designation and/or other specialty certifications, while paralegals who pass PACE, are authorized to use the trademarked phrase “PACE Registered Paralegal” or “RP.” Indiana currently has 44 PACE Registered Paralegals, 28 of whom are members of IPA. Quite likely, some of the remaining Indiana RP’s are members of the other two paralegal associations in Indiana, also affiliated with NFPA ~ Michiana Paralegal Association and the Northeast Indiana Paralegal Association. According to NALA’s website, there are also 49 CLA/CP’s in Indiana; 3 of those are members of IPA. IPA, as a member of NFPA, promotes PACE to its membership; however, IPA respectfully acknowledges with pride all of its members who are credentialed paralegals through national testing, whether RP or CP, as well as one distinguished member, Kim Richardson, RP, CP of Ice Miller, who has taken and successfully passed both examinations. If you haven’t looked at the updated list on the PACE website, I invite you to do so.
Dianna Noyes, RP, NFPA PACE Ambassador Coordinator, recently compiled a chart that compared PACE, the CLA exam and a paralegal examination offered by NALS.
(click here to access remainder of article)
At a recent IPA Board Retreat, one of the Board members insightfully commented that one of the best ways we, as paralegals, can hope to be more professionally respected in the workplace is to become a credentialed paralegal through a national exam. Another Board member, who is currently making plans to begin studying for PACE, also told me recently that she has noticed increased respect from her employer simply by virtue of showing an interest in sitting for the examination. She also saw a noticeable difference in her employer’s professional respect for her through her involvement on the IPA Board. Two other PACE Registered Paralegals recently pondered whether employers even understand what an “RP” or “CP” means to the legal profession. There seems to be little question as to the meaning, for example, when someone writes “RN” after his or her name. All of these points are very well taken.
Earlier this year, Stacey Hunt, CLA, CAS, and Ann Price, RP wrote an article in Legal Assistant Today discussing the two most widely taken examinations to become a credentialed paralegal ~ NALA’s Certified Legal Assistant exam (“the CLA exam”), created in 1976, and NFPA’s Paralegal Advanced Competency Exam (“PACE”), created in 1994. NALA also recently began offering Advanced Specialty Certification exams which is also a part of NFPA’s two-tiered, long range plan.
Interestingly, the very first sentence in the LAT article meets this issue head on ~ “Professional certification lends credibility to any profession, and the paralegal profession is no exception.” [Emphasis added].
Paralegals who pass the CLA exam earn the CLA/CP designation and/or other specialty certifications, while paralegals who pass PACE, are authorized to use the trademarked phrase “PACE Registered Paralegal” or “RP.” Indiana currently has 44 PACE Registered Paralegals, 28 of whom are members of IPA. Quite likely, some of the remaining Indiana RP’s are members of the other two paralegal associations in Indiana, also affiliated with NFPA ~ Michiana Paralegal Association and the Northeast Indiana Paralegal Association. According to NALA’s website, there are also 49 CLA/CP’s in Indiana; 3 of those are members of IPA. IPA, as a member of NFPA, promotes PACE to its membership; however, IPA respectfully acknowledges with pride all of its members who are credentialed paralegals through national testing, whether RP or CP, as well as one distinguished member, Kim Richardson, RP, CP of Ice Miller, who has taken and successfully passed both examinations. If you haven’t looked at the updated list on the PACE website, I invite you to do so.
Dianna Noyes, RP, NFPA PACE Ambassador Coordinator, recently compiled a chart that compared PACE, the CLA exam and a paralegal examination offered by NALS.
(click here to access remainder of article)
Wednesday, May 9, 2007
IE 7 is even cooler than I originally thought
I wrote an article several months about about some of the new features available in Microsoft's update webbrowser, IE7. One feature that I did not mention in my article (but feel compeled to mention now) is IE7 mulitple home page feature. I do not know about you, but for years, I have had a hard time deciding on a home page. I like the idea of news in the morning, but its not really work related. I use Google a fair ammount, but also use a physician directory site alot also. IE7 gives you the ability to have multiple home pages through its home page button (the button that looks like a house on the tool bar). You simple open all of the web pages that you want to use as your home pages (using the tabbed browsing feature). Once you have the pages open, you simply go to the drop down menu next to the home page button and select "add or change home page". You will be given some choices to add a particular page to your home page list or to reset all of the tabs. Once you complete this step, everytime you open your browser or click the home page button, you will get all of your home pages as tabs.
Thursday, April 26, 2007
NFPA 2007 Tech Institute
In case you have not heard, the National Federation of Paralegal Associations ("NFPA") is hosting the first annual legal tech conference geared specifically towards paralegals. The conference will be held in Pittsburgh, PA, on July 19-20, 2007. NFPA has been a buzz lately about the conference and the excitement it has roused within the paralegal community. I have been very impressed with the seminar topics that are published on NFPA's website www.paralegals.org. The topics range from advanced sessions on courtroom and trial presentation software tricks and tips to more general information sessions on internet websites and technology tricks for paralegals. I hope to see you all there. (click here)
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Report from the 2007 NFPA Regulation Conference in Dallas, TX
California, Texas, Florida, Washington, Indiana, Illinois, Pennsylvania, New York, Arkansas, Oregon, Minnesota, Connecticut…..They converged from all corners of the country to meet in Dallas, Texas on March 17-18, 2007, to obtain and to share information regarding implementation of regulation of the paralegal profession. All twenty-six attendees were there with one focus……to see that regulation and standards are implemented for the paralegal profession.
Presentations were made by NFPA representatives describing various forms of regulation, licensure, certification and registration, as well as the status of regulation efforts nationally. Understanding the legislative process, working with bar associations and lobbyists as well as the connection between PACE and regulation were other topics presented.
National Paralegal Regulation Status
Wisconsin is seriously considering paralegal licensure by its petition for licensure pending on the Supreme Court’s list of Pending Rules and Petition. The State of Minnesota closely watches Wisconsin and will likely follow suit upon Wisconsin’s implementation of paralegal licensure.
North Carolina, a pioneer in paralegal regulation, presently has a voluntary paralegal certification program through the North Carolina State Bar Association that went into effect in 2004 and now requires successful completion of an examination.
Florida has worked diligently and appeared to be close to paralegal regulation through its legislature and bar association, but the paralegal organizations of Florida are still working toward coming together on agreement as to exactly what standards they wish to be implemented.
In June, 2006, the Ohio State Bar Association established a voluntary credential program for paralegals in Ohio which provides for certification requiring specific educational standards and experience, the completion of an examination and continuing legal education.
The New Mexico Supreme Court has established minimum standards for the use of the occupational title of “paralegal”.
California has enacted legislation that defines the occupational title of “paralegal”, sets standards for those people who use the title “paralegal” and defines and limits the functions that paralegals can perform. It differentiates “paralegals” from “legal document assistants.”
The State Bar of Texas adopted a voluntary specialty certification program for paralegals in 1974 which was structured after the voluntary specialty certification program for attorneys in Texas. After successful completion of a specialty certification examination, one may use the credential, “Board Certified Legal Assistant – [Area of Law].”
We were happy to report that Proposed Rule 2.2 is pending before the Indiana Supreme Court and will again be a topic for discussion at the ISBA Annual Meeting in October, 2007.
Internationally, the Ontario government recently passed legislation extending protection to consumers who hire independent paralegals. Paralegals will be required to receive training, carry liability insurance and report to a public body that can investigate complaints. This legislation is effective May 1, 2007.
The Bottom Line
It is very clear that the dedicated professional paralegals are determined to see that standards and criteria be agreed upon and implemented to allow the paralegal profession to be quantified and held to expectations and stated standards by the trained, educated professionals that make up the paralegal profession.
Thanks to DAPA
The Dallas Area Paralegal Association provided first class hosting for this conference in its selection of an excellent meeting facility at Esquire Depositions, providing sumptuous food, goodies, gifts and fabulous Texas hospitality. Our thanks go to DAPA for hosting this conference.
2008 Regulation Conference
The Indiana Paralegal Association, Inc. has communicated to NFPA that it is ready and willing to host the next NFPA Paralegal Regulation Conference in 2008. Such a conference held at our central national location would attract many attendees.
We will keep you posted.
Janet S. Logan, C.P.
Paralegal Regulation Committee Chair
Indiana Paralegal Association, Inc.
Email: jlogan@kdlegal.com
Edna Wallace, R.P.
NFPA Primary Representative
Indiana Paralegal Association, Inc.
Email: emw@whzlaw.com
Presentations were made by NFPA representatives describing various forms of regulation, licensure, certification and registration, as well as the status of regulation efforts nationally. Understanding the legislative process, working with bar associations and lobbyists as well as the connection between PACE and regulation were other topics presented.
National Paralegal Regulation Status
Wisconsin is seriously considering paralegal licensure by its petition for licensure pending on the Supreme Court’s list of Pending Rules and Petition. The State of Minnesota closely watches Wisconsin and will likely follow suit upon Wisconsin’s implementation of paralegal licensure.
North Carolina, a pioneer in paralegal regulation, presently has a voluntary paralegal certification program through the North Carolina State Bar Association that went into effect in 2004 and now requires successful completion of an examination.
Florida has worked diligently and appeared to be close to paralegal regulation through its legislature and bar association, but the paralegal organizations of Florida are still working toward coming together on agreement as to exactly what standards they wish to be implemented.
In June, 2006, the Ohio State Bar Association established a voluntary credential program for paralegals in Ohio which provides for certification requiring specific educational standards and experience, the completion of an examination and continuing legal education.
The New Mexico Supreme Court has established minimum standards for the use of the occupational title of “paralegal”.
California has enacted legislation that defines the occupational title of “paralegal”, sets standards for those people who use the title “paralegal” and defines and limits the functions that paralegals can perform. It differentiates “paralegals” from “legal document assistants.”
The State Bar of Texas adopted a voluntary specialty certification program for paralegals in 1974 which was structured after the voluntary specialty certification program for attorneys in Texas. After successful completion of a specialty certification examination, one may use the credential, “Board Certified Legal Assistant – [Area of Law].”
We were happy to report that Proposed Rule 2.2 is pending before the Indiana Supreme Court and will again be a topic for discussion at the ISBA Annual Meeting in October, 2007.
Internationally, the Ontario government recently passed legislation extending protection to consumers who hire independent paralegals. Paralegals will be required to receive training, carry liability insurance and report to a public body that can investigate complaints. This legislation is effective May 1, 2007.
The Bottom Line
It is very clear that the dedicated professional paralegals are determined to see that standards and criteria be agreed upon and implemented to allow the paralegal profession to be quantified and held to expectations and stated standards by the trained, educated professionals that make up the paralegal profession.
Thanks to DAPA
The Dallas Area Paralegal Association provided first class hosting for this conference in its selection of an excellent meeting facility at Esquire Depositions, providing sumptuous food, goodies, gifts and fabulous Texas hospitality. Our thanks go to DAPA for hosting this conference.
2008 Regulation Conference
The Indiana Paralegal Association, Inc. has communicated to NFPA that it is ready and willing to host the next NFPA Paralegal Regulation Conference in 2008. Such a conference held at our central national location would attract many attendees.
We will keep you posted.
Janet S. Logan, C.P.
Paralegal Regulation Committee Chair
Indiana Paralegal Association, Inc.
Email: jlogan@kdlegal.com
Edna Wallace, R.P.
NFPA Primary Representative
Indiana Paralegal Association, Inc.
Email: emw@whzlaw.com
Sunday, April 8, 2007
A Paralegal's View of The ABA Techshow
By: Courtney David Mills
IPA Technology Director and Litigation Paralegal at Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman, P.C.
As I write this article, I am on the train heading back from Chicago after four (4) days of legal tech submersion at the annual The America Bar Association Legal Techshow. The ABA Techshow is an annual gathering of the most prominent legal techies from across the country and some say in the entire world. It includes; lawyers, paralegals, IT professionals, litigation support specialists, law librarians, office managers, etc . I was very impressed with the turn-out of Indiana Paralegals during the convention, but somewhat surprised at the lack of CLE courses directed towards paralegals. However; overall, I believe the conference was a success, and I am already looking forward to next year’s conference. Below are some of the highlights of the conference.
Collaboration Tools in the Legal Field:
The first CLE track that I attended was directed towards Google Docs, Wikis and other web tools used to collaborate with clients and co-counsel on documents and projects. For those that are not familiar with the above applications, Google Docs is essentially a free web-based program (you access it using a web browser and do not download any software) that is designed to allow people to create, edit, and collaborate on word processing documents and spreadsheets in real time. Wikis are essentially editable web pages that use the same general principles as mention above. The most famous Wiki is probably Wikipedia which is an online encyclopedia written, updated, and edited by users. This track also discussed some features of Adobe Professional 8.0 that you allow you send PDF documents to clients and colleagues for review and comment. The exciting part of the new line of Adobe Acrobat products is that as long as the originator of the document has Adobe Standard or Professional 8, the end-users who are actually reviewing the document only need Adobe Reader 8 (free product available for download) in order to make comments on the document. This track also discussed a newer Microsoft product, MS Office Groove, which allows users to set-up teams for working on projects. It allows users to collaborate, review and edit MS Office documents, including power point projects, spreadsheets, presentation documents, etc., in real time, while working with one set of documents (instead of floating version around by email). I believe that many people see this kind of collaborative engagement as the future of the legal profession and the business world in general. These collaborative products give a team the ability to have a centralized copy of a project or single document that is stored on a secure server. The authorized users can review, edit and collaborate on the document. This replaces the old fashion methods of emailing different versions to colleagues, etc. It also makes the location and work schedules of the participants largely irrelevant. You could have a physician expert in New York, an attorney at a deposition in Houston, and a paralegal in Indiana all working on cross examination questions / outline for an opposing expert who is being deposed in Houston.
Courtroom Technology:
There were several CLE sessions discussing judges' opinions on courtroom technology and Electronic Evidence Presentation (“EEP”). A lot of these discussions centered around the under utilization of EEP in real world litigation. Several of the judges admitted that when they speak to jurors following some form of EEP (even something as simple as a power point presentation played during closing statements), they discovered that overwhelmingly, jurors appreciated the use of technology and were surprised that it was not being used more often. There were also some exciting products on display that give an idea about the immediate future of courtroom technology. There were computers with 55 inch plasma screens that enabled users to show evidence as 3-D objects that could be manipulated and controlled from the computer. There were large white boards that used projection technology and touch screen technology to essentially allow users to work interactively with documents or other forms of evidence, i.e. presenting documents on large screens, circling key words or using your hand as a highlighter to highlight key evidence on the screen.
Document Automation:
When I saw the track title about document automation, I was thinking about mail merge features in Word and Word Perfect that allow users to create a template letter, and merge the template with a list of addresses that will create a stack of letters for you in seconds. This form of document automation is simply a very sophisticated version of copying and pasting. The newer programs available are the next generation of document automation. There are new software programs that are designed for document intensive areas of the law, i.e. probate law, contract work, etc. These programs essentially automate many of the functions that an attorney/paralegal will do when opening the case. If you paste the caption, and answer some quick "interview questions", i.e. who is the injured party or decedent, are the parties male or female, what type of case is it (you select from a set of pre-programmed templates)? The program will create all documents that you have set it to create, i.e., your initial letter to your client acknowledging representation, letters to insurance carrier regarding same, initial discovery requests to Plaintiff and co-counsel, an appearance, and initial motion for enlargement of time, etc. The program fills in the correct names, dates, pronouns, singular/plural references, and other details using a form of artificial intelligence. It automates the entire process, and can essentially complete the work that usually takes an attorney, paralegal, and secretary several hours, in several minutes. However, there are several downsides to this technology. For instance, a system as described above takes time and money to set-up on the front-end (and will save time in the long run). Also, these systems are really designed towards project based billing practices or flat-fee billing systems.
Conclusion:
As I discussed above, the ABA Techshow is a chance for legal techies to get together and talk about current issues, i.e. the best practices for production of ESI, new legal tech software, websites, etc. Another new feature at this year’s techshow is the ability to sign-up for dinners with the speakers. You sign-up for whatever topic/speaker you would like and the Techshow staff makes the arrangements and reservations, etc. You get to enjoy a nice meal and really get to talk to the presenters. The ABA Techshow has been welcoming to paralegals from across the country and since the conference is held in Chicago, it has been especially convenient for Indiana Paralegals. I keep telling my colleagues that the attorneys are going to be increasingly looking to paralegals and litigation support specialists for answers to legal technology questions. I hope to see even more Indiana Paralegals at next year’s tech show.
Blog of the Month:
ABA Techshow Blog: The ABA Techshow Blog is regularly updated by the Techshow presenters and staff. You will catch the latest and greatest from the Techshow faculty.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/ABATECHSHOWblog
Website of the Month:
You Send It: If you have ever been frustrated while trying to send a large document or PDF to someone and getting a bounce-back message due to size limitations for the recipients email system, this website is for your. This is a free service that allows you send large files to someone. You essentially upload the file, enter the receipiant's email address and your email address the systems send the other person and email (it looks like it is from your email address) with a link to the file. The person clicks on the link, and down loads the file. Best of all, its free.
http://www.yousendit.com/
IPA Technology Director and Litigation Paralegal at Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman, P.C.
As I write this article, I am on the train heading back from Chicago after four (4) days of legal tech submersion at the annual The America Bar Association Legal Techshow. The ABA Techshow is an annual gathering of the most prominent legal techies from across the country and some say in the entire world. It includes; lawyers, paralegals, IT professionals, litigation support specialists, law librarians, office managers, etc . I was very impressed with the turn-out of Indiana Paralegals during the convention, but somewhat surprised at the lack of CLE courses directed towards paralegals. However; overall, I believe the conference was a success, and I am already looking forward to next year’s conference. Below are some of the highlights of the conference.
Collaboration Tools in the Legal Field:
The first CLE track that I attended was directed towards Google Docs, Wikis and other web tools used to collaborate with clients and co-counsel on documents and projects. For those that are not familiar with the above applications, Google Docs is essentially a free web-based program (you access it using a web browser and do not download any software) that is designed to allow people to create, edit, and collaborate on word processing documents and spreadsheets in real time. Wikis are essentially editable web pages that use the same general principles as mention above. The most famous Wiki is probably Wikipedia which is an online encyclopedia written, updated, and edited by users. This track also discussed some features of Adobe Professional 8.0 that you allow you send PDF documents to clients and colleagues for review and comment. The exciting part of the new line of Adobe Acrobat products is that as long as the originator of the document has Adobe Standard or Professional 8, the end-users who are actually reviewing the document only need Adobe Reader 8 (free product available for download) in order to make comments on the document. This track also discussed a newer Microsoft product, MS Office Groove, which allows users to set-up teams for working on projects. It allows users to collaborate, review and edit MS Office documents, including power point projects, spreadsheets, presentation documents, etc., in real time, while working with one set of documents (instead of floating version around by email). I believe that many people see this kind of collaborative engagement as the future of the legal profession and the business world in general. These collaborative products give a team the ability to have a centralized copy of a project or single document that is stored on a secure server. The authorized users can review, edit and collaborate on the document. This replaces the old fashion methods of emailing different versions to colleagues, etc. It also makes the location and work schedules of the participants largely irrelevant. You could have a physician expert in New York, an attorney at a deposition in Houston, and a paralegal in Indiana all working on cross examination questions / outline for an opposing expert who is being deposed in Houston.
Courtroom Technology:
There were several CLE sessions discussing judges' opinions on courtroom technology and Electronic Evidence Presentation (“EEP”). A lot of these discussions centered around the under utilization of EEP in real world litigation. Several of the judges admitted that when they speak to jurors following some form of EEP (even something as simple as a power point presentation played during closing statements), they discovered that overwhelmingly, jurors appreciated the use of technology and were surprised that it was not being used more often. There were also some exciting products on display that give an idea about the immediate future of courtroom technology. There were computers with 55 inch plasma screens that enabled users to show evidence as 3-D objects that could be manipulated and controlled from the computer. There were large white boards that used projection technology and touch screen technology to essentially allow users to work interactively with documents or other forms of evidence, i.e. presenting documents on large screens, circling key words or using your hand as a highlighter to highlight key evidence on the screen.
Document Automation:
When I saw the track title about document automation, I was thinking about mail merge features in Word and Word Perfect that allow users to create a template letter, and merge the template with a list of addresses that will create a stack of letters for you in seconds. This form of document automation is simply a very sophisticated version of copying and pasting. The newer programs available are the next generation of document automation. There are new software programs that are designed for document intensive areas of the law, i.e. probate law, contract work, etc. These programs essentially automate many of the functions that an attorney/paralegal will do when opening the case. If you paste the caption, and answer some quick "interview questions", i.e. who is the injured party or decedent, are the parties male or female, what type of case is it (you select from a set of pre-programmed templates)? The program will create all documents that you have set it to create, i.e., your initial letter to your client acknowledging representation, letters to insurance carrier regarding same, initial discovery requests to Plaintiff and co-counsel, an appearance, and initial motion for enlargement of time, etc. The program fills in the correct names, dates, pronouns, singular/plural references, and other details using a form of artificial intelligence. It automates the entire process, and can essentially complete the work that usually takes an attorney, paralegal, and secretary several hours, in several minutes. However, there are several downsides to this technology. For instance, a system as described above takes time and money to set-up on the front-end (and will save time in the long run). Also, these systems are really designed towards project based billing practices or flat-fee billing systems.
Conclusion:
As I discussed above, the ABA Techshow is a chance for legal techies to get together and talk about current issues, i.e. the best practices for production of ESI, new legal tech software, websites, etc. Another new feature at this year’s techshow is the ability to sign-up for dinners with the speakers. You sign-up for whatever topic/speaker you would like and the Techshow staff makes the arrangements and reservations, etc. You get to enjoy a nice meal and really get to talk to the presenters. The ABA Techshow has been welcoming to paralegals from across the country and since the conference is held in Chicago, it has been especially convenient for Indiana Paralegals. I keep telling my colleagues that the attorneys are going to be increasingly looking to paralegals and litigation support specialists for answers to legal technology questions. I hope to see even more Indiana Paralegals at next year’s tech show.
Blog of the Month:
ABA Techshow Blog: The ABA Techshow Blog is regularly updated by the Techshow presenters and staff. You will catch the latest and greatest from the Techshow faculty.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/ABATECHSHOWblog
Website of the Month:
You Send It: If you have ever been frustrated while trying to send a large document or PDF to someone and getting a bounce-back message due to size limitations for the recipients email system, this website is for your. This is a free service that allows you send large files to someone. You essentially upload the file, enter the receipiant's email address and your email address the systems send the other person and email (it looks like it is from your email address) with a link to the file. The person clicks on the link, and down loads the file. Best of all, its free.
http://www.yousendit.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
